SCR 3-1126
SCR 3-1126: Multiple occurrences of the same keyword in an object – Valid or Not?
Priority: high
Problem Summary
A Rosetta team has presented a draft label that contains multiple occurences of the SPICE_FILE_NAME and NOTE keywords. A medium-depth search of the PDS standards documents reveals no PDS standard for how to deal with repeated keywords. The lvtool (current release 2.20) flags this as a warning of the same severity as an unmatched standard value (i.e., the sort of warning we expect to be cleaned up prior to or at final delivery). VTool does not flag the multiple occurences of these keywords at all. If multiple occurences of a single keyword within an object is valid, the PDS standards should say so and provide an indication of the significant of a repeated keyword (are the values concatenated into a series or sequence, or does one overwrite another and in what order)? If multiple occurences are not valid, the PDS standards need to say so explicitly.
Working Group
T. King (lead) M. Cayanan, L. Huber, S. Hughes, D. Simpson
Originator: Anne Raugh
Standards Change Request
Version | Date | Author(s) | Format | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2008-05-07 | T. King | DOC | |
2 | 2008-05-07 | T. King | DOC DOC | |
3 | 2008-05-13 | T. King | DOC DOC | |
4 | 2008-05-20 | T. King | DOC DOC | |
5 | 2008-10-22 | T. King | DOC | |
6 | 2008-10-23 | T. King | DOC DOC | |
7 | 2008-11-17 | T. King | DOC DOC |
Discussion
- Discussion Blog
- Telecons: 2007-08-29 (HTML), 2007-09-12 (HTML), 2007-09-26 (WAV), 2007-10-17 (WAV), 2007-10-31 (HTML), 2007-11-14 (HTML), 2007-11-28 (HTML), 2008-01-09 (HTML), 2008-01-30 (HTML), 2008-02-13 (WAV), 2008-02-27 (HTML), 2008-03-19 (WAV), 2008-04-16 (WAV), 2008-05-07 (HTML), 2008-05-21 (HTML), 2008-06-04 (HTML), 2008-07-02 (HTML), 2008-07-16 (WAV), 2008-08-13 (HTML), 2008-09-10 (MP3), 2008-10-15 (HTML), 2008-11-12 (MP3), 2008-12-10 (HTML)
Supplementary Material
Status
Votes
The Tech Group approved the SCR at the 11/12/08 Standards Telecon by a vote of 8-0-1 (yes-no-absent).
Node | Representative | Version 7 |
---|---|---|
ATM | Lyle Huber | yes |
EN | Elizabeth Rye | yes |
GEO | Susie Slavney | yes |
IMG | Chris Isbell | yes |
NAIF | Boris Semenov | yes |
PPI | absent | – |
RINGS | Mitch Gordon | yes |
RS | Dick Simpson | yes |
SBN | Anne Raugh | yes |
The Tech Group recommended MC review of v7 of the SCR at the 11/12/08 Standards Telecon by a vote of 4-4-1 (yes-no-absent). (Tied vote results in sending to the MC.)
Node | Representative | Version 7 |
---|---|---|
ATM | Lyle Huber | yes |
EN | Elizabeth Rye | yes |
GEO | Susie Slavney | no |
IMG | Chris Isbell | no |
NAIF | Boris Semenov | no |
PPI | absent | – |
RINGS | Mitch Gordon | no |
RS | Dick Simpson | yes |
SBN | Anne Raugh | yes |
The MC approved the SCR via email on 01/22/09 by a vote of 9-0-0 (yes-no-absent).
Node | Representative | Version 7 |
---|---|---|
GEO | Ray Arvidson | yes |
IMG | Lisa Gaddis | yes |
PPI | Ray Walker | yes |
RINGS | Mark Showalter | yes |
SBN | Mike A’Hearn | yes |
NAIF | Chuck Acton | yes |
RS | Dick Simpson | yes |