Standards Problem Report ======================== Title: PDS Lacks Time Standard Date: 23 April 2003 Submitted by: Anne Raugh, SBN Problem: START_TIME is a fundamental search parameter in nearly all PDS data products, yet there is no formal definition of what time should be recorded in START_TIME. In fact, time is not well defined in most, if not all, elements with a type of TIME. Issues: Internally, it is not possible to make positive statements about the results of time-based searches even within a single mission. The uncertainty in START_TIME definition also casts doubt on any other calculations and parameters that might depend on START_TIME, including pointing information and target location. Externally, it effectively allows each data preparer to define his own local time standard for each data set, or - worse - to not define any time standard. The long-term usefulness and reliability of the resulting archive is significantly diminished by lack of a well-defined time standard. Suggested Solution? Examine all elements currently in the PSDD with a GENERAL_DATA_TYPE of TIME. Determine the appropriate time standard for each and insert this explicitly into each definition. Note that legacy data is unlikely to be reprocessed to correct START_TIME, even when that is possible. A method must be provided to alert users to poorly-defined START_TIME values in legacy data. Prioritization Considerations: Lack of a time standard clearly has not impeded the archiving activities of the PDS to date. However, it is - or at least should be - embarrassing that an organization that exists to preserve scientific data does not have a well-defined time standard for fundmental measurements like START_TIME. Impact/Schedule Considerations: Requiring well-defined time standards will improve the reliability and long-term usefulness of the archived data. Requiring consistent time standards across all data sets will improve the reliability of time-based searching algorithms. Time definitions for legacy data may not be recoverable, and legacy data are unlikely to be corrected for this problem alone. This may corrupt the results of time-based searches. It may be difficult to ensure that users of legacy data are informed that current time standards do not apply to data archived prior to a particular date. Discussion of what constitutes an appropriate time standard for any given value, particularly one that is applicable across all data types, may need to be undertaken at a very high level by the science managers. All data preparers must be informed of the explicit time standard requirements early in the design process, and the time values provided in product labels must be carefully checked for standards adherence.